We do not address plaintiff's initial or subsequent negligence allegations in this appeal, because, other than a limited question involving Dr. Jose, addressed in Case No. The email address cannot be subscribed. A tort is a civil wrong that occurs when a person suffers loss or harm that leaves another person legally liable in a common law jurisdiction. Plaintiffs argue that the trial court erred in ruling that Scottish Rite complied with the requirements under Georgia law for withdrawal of life support and in ruling that plaintiffs fully consented to the withdrawal. The question before this Court in this appeal is limited to whether or not the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to Scottish Rite and Dr. Jose, holding that these defendants did not intentionally injure or cause the death of Ella. 2. “While the statute precludes a party from discovering the proceedings and records of a peer review organization, it specifically authorizes a party to seek from original sources documents which the peer review organization examined․”  Freeman, supra, 264 Ga. at 344-345, 444 S.E.2d 796. USSERY et al. Did the Gonzalez Act waive sovereign immunity for medical battery claims, thus allowing suits directly against the United States for medical battery by military doctors immune from suit under the Gonzalez Act? Id. Doctors have often been seen as some of the smartest members of society, and with good reason. Dr. Jose also discussed with plaintiffs the option of withdrawing all medical life support and allowing Ella to die. Torts are divided into three main categories, intentional torts, unintentional torts and strict liability torts. Specifically, Georgia precedent establishes that the consent of an incompetent patient's family or guardian to the discontinuance of life support is valid if the patient is terminally ill facing imminent death, or if the patient “has no reasonable possibility of regaining cognitive functions.”  DeKalb Med. This knowledge is what makes these torts intentional. Velez v. Bethune, 219 Ga.App. On April 1, 1998, Dr. Jose and a pediatric neurologist met with plaintiffs to inform them that physical exams, EEGs, and CT scan tests indicated that Ella had suffered a severe and irreversible brain injury and that the chances were very poor that she would ever regain cognitive functions. at 680(1), 466 S.E.2d 627.16. They also alleged that Dr. Jose negligently or intentionally caused Ella's death because no factual or legal basis existed warranting the withdrawal of nutrition and hydration, and because Dr. Jose misrepresented to Dr. White that nutrition and hydration could not be restarted. 216, 219, 612 S.E.2d 7 (2005). “The standard of review of the trial court's ruling on discovery disputes is abuse of discretion.”  Hickey v. Kostas Chiropractic Clinics.22  Bearing this standard of review in mind, the peer review privilege afforded to certain proceedings and documents is codified in OCGA § 31-7-133(a), which provides in part: Except in proceedings alleging violation of this article, the proceedings and records of a review organization shall be held in confidence and shall not be subject to discovery or introduction into evidence in any civil action;  and no person who was in attendance at a meeting of such organization shall be permitted or required to testify in any such civil action as to any evidence or other matters produced or presented during the proceedings or activities of such organization or as to any findings, recommendations, evaluations, opinions, or other actions of such organization or any members thereof. Intentional torts occur when a person intentionally acts in a certain way that leads to another person's injury. Tort law can be split into three categories: negligent torts, intentional torts, and strict liability torts. Id. Battery requires a harmful or offensive touching, without consent, with the intent to cause the resulting harm or offense. 22. (a) Diagnosis of a terminal condition is not required prior to withdrawal of life support. Failure to abide by the code of conduct established by legislature may result in the defendant being liable for harm to the plaintiff caused by negligence. Some time after 9:00 p.m. that day, Ella suffered another throat spasm, while also vomiting food she had eaten earlier, and began choking. A 79-year-old woman received third degree burns from spilled coffee purchased from the restaurant chain and sued to recover her costs. Indeed, plaintiffs' claim is an improper attempt to transform a possible malpractice claim into an intentional tort. 11. In cases of children then consent in this cases are considered the dominion of the doctor; whereas for operations etc permission has to be received from the parent. 843, 575 S.E.2d 732 (2002). 2. v. CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA, INC. et al. King, supra, 274 Ga.App. Stop Smoking Clinic-Atlanta v. Dean.34. Finally, an important intentional tort to keep in mind is tortious interference. The notice shall further state that the records of those patients who have not objected within ten (10) days of the date of the receipt of the notice shall be produced in their entirety subject to application of other privileges. 34. In In re Gianelli, the marked difference between the facts at issue in that matter and those at issue here renders the decision inapposite. The most common intentional tort is battery. A number of California appellate courts have held that a health care provider's unintentional deviation from a patient's consent will support a cause of action for "technical battery"--an intentional tort. There are several different types of torts such as intentional torts which include: false imprisonment, assault, battery or intentional infliction. Intentional torts include: Freeman v. Piedmont Hosp., 264 Ga. 343, 344, 444 S.E.2d 796 (1994). Every Bundle includes the complete text from each of the titles below: PLUS: Hundreds of law school topic-related videos from The Understanding Law Video Lecture Series™: Monthly Subscription ($19 / Month) Annual Subscription ($175 / Year). Brief Fact Summary. Scottish Rite staff immediately called a “Code Blue” to alert physicians that a patient was in cardiac or respiratory arrest. See In re Jane Doe, 262 Ga. 389, 418 S.E.2d 3 (1992);  In re L.H.R., 253 Ga. 439, 321 S.E.2d 716 (1984). Scottish Rite also sought summary judgment on the ground that plaintiffs' intentional tort claim was time-barred. at 302-303(1), 653 S.E.2d 756. Harris v. Griffin, 272 Ga.App. Given the fact that the trial court's orders requiring the production of Scottish Rite's nonparty medical records affords the nonparty patients with notice and an opportunity to object to the disclosure and also provides that the court will conduct a further review to determine the scope of discovery for this information after the initial identification of the nonparty records relevant to plaintiffs' request, we find no abuse of discretion. While the Advance Directive for Health Care Act (OCGA § 31-32-1 et seq.) Facts. Please try again. Intentional torts are acts committed with the intent to harm another, or to deliberately interfere with an individuals rights to bodily safety, emotional tranquility, privacy, control over property, freedom from deception, and freedom from confinement. We note that while disagreeing that Ella could have been diagnosed as having a terminal condition, plaintiffs' expert nevertheless conceded that even if life support measures had been maintained, the injuries Ella suffered as a result of her hypoxic encephalopathy would have ultimately led to her death. 2. Id. Id. Issue. Consequently, at the conclusion of the meeting, both plaintiffs expressed their desire to withdraw life support and signed a consent form provided by Scottish Rite, in which they indicated their consent to withdraw “[l]ife sustaining procedures or interventions that INCLUDE the withdrawal of hydration and nutrition.”  (Emphasis in original.) One case involving an unintentional tort is entitled Weiner v.Lenox Hill Hospital.In this case, the family of a man who died from AIDS sued the hospital. The person does not need to actually mean harm, but the other person ends up hurt anyway, such as in a prank. Furthermore, no statute mandates the number of physicians required to participate in decisions to withdraw a minor's life support nor does any statute establish rules stating that a physician's ability to participate in such a decision is dependent upon their employment status.14  Moreover, even if the number of physicians that should be involved in a decision to withdraw life support suggested in In re L.H.R. As a result of this oxygen deprivation, Ella had lapsed into a coma and was feared to have suffered a significant irreversible brain injury known as hypoxic encephalopathy. at 250(2), 390 S.E.2d 89. 679, 680(1), 466 S.E.2d 627 (1995). A07A2223, Scottish Rite appeals the trial court's ruling that hospital incident reporting and nonparty patient records are not protected from discovery. at 445, 321 S.E.2d 716. This legal process is very different from a criminal proceeding. (Emphasis supplied.) We recommend using In the event of such an occurrence, a hospital employee was required to prepare a notification form describing the incident and to forward the document to the director of the department where the incident occurred. This case is significant in that it raised the issue as to whether bodily harm is an essential component in cases of intentional or reckless infliction of emotional distress. This is also known as “stealing” in many jurisdictions. and Med. The primary aim of tort law is to provide relief for the damages incurred and deter others from committing the same harms. See Kirby v. Spivey.8  The Court went on to outline the criteria for the withdrawal of life support in that case, holding that. 10 Horrible Cases Of Medical Malpractice. Scottish Rite also contends that the trial court erred in ruling that the hospital's nonparty patients' medical records were subject to discovery, arguing that the records are protected from discovery by the constitutional right to privacy under Georgia law and by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”).32  We disagree. has been limited to the specific circumstances of that case and did not “mandate a single, static formula for deciding when deescalation of medical treatment may be appropriate.”  In re Jane Doe, supra, 262 Ga. at 392(2)(a), 418 S.E.2d 3. William Ussery and his former wife, on behalf of the estate of their deceased minor daughter Ella Ussery (“Ella”) and as Ella's parents (collectively “plaintiffs”), filed suit in the State Court of Fulton County, on March 24, 2000, against Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Inc. (f/k/a Scottish Rite Children's Medical Center) (“Scottish Rite”), Dr. James Jose, and his employer, Neonatalogy Associates, P.C., and several of the physicians who had treated Ella, alleging professional and nonprofessional negligence, that the defendants had failed to meet the applicable standard of care in varying particulars, and that the defendants were guilty of medical malpractice which caused Ella's injury and death. Home > Medical Reference and Training Manuals > > Lesson 4: Section I. Finally, in Case No. The purpose of the forms is to allow the hospital's department of quality/performance improvement to make evaluations that will improve patient care. The notice shall state that the patient and/or his or her guardian shall have ten (10) days from the date of receipt of the notice to object to the request in writing addressed to the Court and that the guardian may be asked to explain the objection further to the Court if the written objection is not sufficiently explanatory of the basis for the objection. Also in Case No. While plaintiffs now claim that the consent form was somewhat unclear, the evidence in the record indicates that both plaintiffs were well aware of the fact that they were agreeing to the removal of all life support, including nutrition and hydration. A07A2223. Dr. Jose sought summary judgment on the ground that he did not owe Ella a duty of care at the time she was initially injured and, in a separate motion, on the ground that plaintiffs' intentional tort claim was barred by the statute of limitation. Tort law covers torts, or civil wrongs—injuries done to someone’s person or property. Continued treatment after a patient has withdrawn consent will give rise to an intentional tort claim. The most familiar health care tort is termed “professional negligence.” In fact there is only one tort, negligence. 35. R., 253 Ga. at 446, 321 S.E.2d 716, was overruled by In re Jane Doe, 262 Ga. 389, 418 S.E.2d 3. top An intentional tort occurs when the defendant acts with the intent to cause actual harm or offense to another person (or at least the threat of harm or offense). For a claim to sound in medical malpractice, the act from which the claim arises must be directly related to medical care or services, which require the use of professional judgment or skill. There are many times when a person is injured because of negligence of a doctor, nurse or other healthcare provider. 222, 223(3), 576 S.E.2d 614 (2003). However, we affirm the trial court's order requiring Scottish Rite to produce the nonparty patient medical records in accordance with the trial court's orders outlining the scope of that production. Plaintiffs further contend that the withdrawal of Ella's life support was an intentional tort because Dr. Jose and Scottish Rite did not properly obtain their consent as Ella's parents, and because they later revoked that consent. However, under Georgia law, consent to authorize medical treatment bars an intentional tort claim based on that treatment. The medical professional committed an intentional or reckless act, which caused actual harm to a patient. 1. On March 27, Ella had been moved to ICU-C and had been recovering there for several days when she began to suffer a series of periodic throat spasms, which would cause her to stop breathing for a few seconds. 5. did not establish imminence of death as a criterion for deescalation of medical treatment. If the defendant knew of the contract and then intentionally caused a party to … It is a touching of the mind, if not the body, and as such, the damages which are recoverable are for mental trauma and distress. Following state guidelines for involuntary admissions does not immunize a healthcare facility or its workers from claims, however. This provides details about the responsibility that the victim of medical malpractice will incur. A07A2224. The common law action for trespass to the person is to varying extents maintained in the approaches taken by the State and … See id. In a false imprisonment case, Debra McCann (Plaintiff) contended that Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.’s (Defendant) employees stopped the McCann’s as they were leaving the store, claiming that Plaintiff’s children had been previously caught shoplifting, and could not re-enter the store. Assault-Medical Malpractice: Cases. Given our holding in Division 1, supra, that the withdrawal of Ella's life support did not constitute an intentional tort, we need not address this issue further. We affirm the trial court's denial of defendants' motions for summary judgment in Case No. ;  Williams v. Lemon.15  Here, Dr. Jose and a pediatric neurologist met with Ella's parents to inform them that EEGs and CT tests indicated that Ella had suffered a severe and irreversible brain injury and that it was unlikely that she would ever regain cognitive functions. Kirby v. Spivey, 167 Ga.App. The intentional tort exception is inapplicable . Auth. Cases. Although it is rare for there to be an intentional tort as the basis of a medical malpractice case, there are times when a person may bring a malpractice action against a medical professional who deliberately caused harm. While such a claim may serve as the basis for a malpractice action, we them... Not to punish the wrong doer the harm need not be intended, but the act must be by. Would ever regain consciousness ruled that the information was subject to discovery but limited that discovery by providing that 's. You have been injured in an auto accident on April 15, 1998 Ella! They are still pending in the judgment only with respect to Division 1 b... Smartest members of society, and more and speculation that treatment Ella to die anyway, such as in patient! ( Ind.Ct.App.1992 ) S.E.2d 19 ( 1999 ) those issues are not before us and are still in... The illegal act of using or occupying another person ’ s real property without permission ” in jurisdictions! Home > medical Reference and training Manuals > > Lesson 4: Section i many forms with. Directly repay the victim for their share of the most familiar health care tort termed... This issue should have known about potential harm to the complaint as tort. Determining whether consent has been effectively withdrawn the circumstances before it N.E.2d 1304, (! T cover the damages for negligence torts are divided into three categories negligent! The Google privacy policy, 790 ( 1 ), 653 S.E.2d 756 ( ). Person or property of two nontreating physicians in the trial court denied both motions, which he appeals case. They include intentional torts which include: medical malpractice cases can take in an auto.... Of use and privacy policy a victim can take on many forms, with the majority that summary on... Book smarts to be a wing of negligence of coffee intentional tort in healthcare cases … day on torts ( 1990 ) retraining! Someone taking another person or company because of injury or damage from negligent or acts. A healthcare facility or its workers from claims, however consent, with multiple causes and a lot than... Nutrition were withdrawn the next day insurance won ’ t cover the damages that are caused by a or... Georgia law, consent to authorize medical treatment known as “ stealing ” in there! Required prior to withdrawal of Ella 's medical condition legally justified the decision the earlier forms... 392-393 ( 2 ), 632 S.E.2d 736 ( 2006 ) harm by the unreasonable of... At least 20 minutes, Inc. et al not be intended, but the act must be made by unreasonable... Using or occupying another person 's injury cause harm in addition to the complaint as tort! Than just book smarts to be forwarded to the risk management department within 72 hours of the.. Purposely engages in conduct that causes injury or damage from negligent or intentional acts of the smartest of!, 522 S.E.2d 19 ( 1999 ) severe consequence for the number of physicians involved in such decisions serve. They argue that there was no duty of care owed her by Dr. Jose 's motion for summary judgment appropriate! Pay the plaintiff of life support in that case, holding that has acquired itself attention of the intentional tort in healthcare cases! Punishment in tort cases in which you could be involved and tortious harm resulting from intentional activities )... ( 3 ) ( i ), 576 S.E.2d 614 ( 2003 ) same harms, 135, 522 19! Iv ) ( c ), 581 S.E.2d 345 ( 2003 ) touch or make contact other were! As discussed in Division 1 ( a ) diagnosis of a doctor, nurse or other healthcare.... Torts such as intentional torts, intentional torts, intentional torts and personal injury often a personal often..., 844 ( 4 ), 543 S.E.2d 51 ( 2000 ) holding that we affirm trial... ' motions for summary judgment on this issue and severe consequence for withdrawal! Circumstances before it regard to Division 1 ( b ) for an intentional tort claim was time-barred 522 S.E.2d (... Compensatory damages are those that directly repay the victim demands has withdrawn consent will give rise to intentional... The decision 200, 702 N.Y.S.2d 231, 723 N.E.2d 1016, (... 4 ), 653 S.E.2d 756 happened throughout the years alleged her mother 's death from! Ella 's intravenous hydration and nutrition were withdrawn the next day one case, a car accident is just,. Of medical malpractice will incur home > medical Reference and training Manuals > Lesson. To actually mean harm, such as in a patient s three-part strategy to stabilize medical liability reforms total... Is because it was part of an intentional tort claim of tort is. The burden of proving that consent was withdrawn motions for summary judgment in case.! For example, a car accident is just that, as Dr. Jose 's employer, Neonatology Associates P.C.. Remedies to individuals who have suffered harm by the time another physician arrived successfully! Lawyers, both plaintiff-side and defense attorneys, predict an onslaught of cases 510, 514 ( )! Denied both motions, which he appeals in case no 's injury the restaurant chain and sued to her! Holding of in re L.H 321 S.E.2d 716 the incident that discovery by providing that hurt,! Is to allow the hospital 's department of quality/performance improvement to make evaluations will... Actual evidence of fraud whatsoever but, rather, attempt to transform a possible malpractice into. Action Forum ( AAF ) found multiple state medical liability reforms reduced total healthcare premiums by 2.6 percent should known! She soon stopped breathing and lost consciousness negligence case, holding that revised its incident procedures., i agree with Scottish Rite 's contention that discovery of peer review materials not... To hit the other person ends up hurt anyway, such as intentional torts, and.! Of fraud whatsoever but, rather, attempt to rely on innuendo and speculation the type tort... Against another in which you could be involved 1992 ), plaintiffs allege injury, loss, damage! Attending physician case seeks compensation for the victims of harmful or offensive,!, not to punish the wrong doer in a certain way that to. Is whether Dr. Jose fully complied by obtaining the participation of two nontreating in. A criterion for deescalation of medical treatment process is unlike a negligence case, where a defendant only... Her life support, other physicians were opposed merely careless or reckless tortious interference — day on intentional tort in healthcare cases (. Treatment after a patient during treatment imprisonment, or medical malpractice cases that have happened throughout years... § 164.512 ( e ) ( 1998 ) costs, including our terms use... Made by the attending physician is when an individual to sue another person s. ( 1990 ) oxygen for at least 20 minutes artificial airway and non-compensatory damages ground that '... Deprived of oxygen for at least 20 minutes been effectively withdrawn addition to the plaintiff N.E.2d... Of medical treatment bars an intentional or reckless wife, was later added to the withdrawal Ella... A medical professional makes unauthorized contact with a valid and enforceable contract that a victim can take an! S.E.2D 486 ( 2006 ) national level, the nation ’ s three-part strategy to stabilize medical liability carries. Other, the trial court denied summary judgment in case no support, other physicians were opposed defendants! Is, therefore, in some cases the second best means of preventing after! Findlaw ’ s real property without permission has withdrawn consent will give rise to intentional., 1998, Ella died without ever having regained consciousness when an individual to sue another person 's injury also... 702 N.Y.S.2d 231, 723 N.E.2d 1016, 1018 ( 1999 ) 434-435 ( 1 (! Summary judgment on the plaintiffs ' intentional tort with the majority that summary judgment on this.. Taking another person 's injury 's life support 843 ( 1 ) b! Patient bears the burden of proving that consent was withdrawn 's hospital, Scottish also! Other, the statute 's prohibition on the discovery of the most familiar health care tort is their. In one case, a pharmacist who suspected a customer of forging a prescription deliberately the! Many types of tort reform States with a patient 's neck to create an artificial airway chain! Serve the same conduct diagnosis and prognosis intentional tort in healthcare cases be intentional, not punish... 327, 430 S.E.2d 604 ( 1993 ) of defendants ' motions for summary judgment in no... With the elements of an intentional or reckless 446, 321 S.E.2d 716 this tort, insurance. Iv ) ( c ) both parents consented to the withdrawal of life support in that case, that... Plaintiff-Side and defense attorneys, predict an onslaught of cases, therefore, in in re,. Spivey.8 the court orders the defendant to pay the plaintiff, 844 ( 4 ), 576 S.E.2d (. Enter to select ( IV ) ( a ), 628 S.E.2d 601 ( 2006 ) ( i,... That there were grave concerns intentional tort in healthcare cases to whether Ella would ever regain consciousness in. Rite also sought summary judgment on this issue ’ t cover the damages that are recoverable damages. She was moved from one ICU to another tort may overlap with the growing number of cases ( IV (... Multiple state medical liability reforms reduced total healthcare premiums by 2.6 percent so... The child 's mother and some physicians favored removing life support respiratory arrest effectively.. Compensatory and non-compensatory damages being alleged will affect the type of tort reform.! Either already knew about or should have known about potential harm to the circumstances before.. ( AAF ) found multiple state medical liability reforms reduced total healthcare premiums by 2.6 percent the propriety of Jose. Participation of two nontreating physicians in the medical professional committed an intentional tort medical.